“Communist” Tyulkin criticizes
bourgeois authority for insufficiency of nationalism
1st secretary of
the Central Committee of Russian Communist Workers Party Viktor Tyulkin wrote
at April 24th, 2010:
“… taking into account the specific of the
moment and breaking out anti-soviet, anti-Stalinist hysteria on so-called
“Katyn case” and actual president’s and premier’s support the falsification of
the real history of that events, which was put to use already by minister of
propaganda of Third Reich Josef Gebbels, the opposition really must to point
out, that, subscribing to that anti-soviet and anti-Russian hysteria, the authority
defends not the historical truth, but, first of all, its exploiter essence, its
mostly anti-national policy”.
As a matter of fact, Russian
imperialists recognized “Katyn case” under the pressure of progressive world public;
moreover, they recognized it very reluctantly: in spite of numerous facts, they
continue representing World War II from the side of Russian imperialism as
“Great Patriotic War”. And “communists” agree with them on this, moreover, they
criticize them not for their nationalism, but for insufficiency (!) of nationalism.
The founder of Hizb ut Tahrir
Taqiuddin an-Nabhani was really right when he wrote at
“The Socialist idea has come to instil
responsibility into the thought about subsistence, namely a responsibility
towards the poor and the proletarians, but it fail to resist before life and
with time it deviated until it turned into a mere rhetoric or a shadow, and it
gradually lost the responsibility over others until it became effectively a
mere thought about subsistence, no different from the Capitalist thought, in
terms of lack of responsibility over others; it turned in essence into more of
a nationalist idea than a humanitarian idea”
(It is clearly, that the late
“Socialist idea” means official “Marxism”, “Marxism” of sirs tyulkins).
See also my review of this
Nabhani’s work.
April 26th, 2010
A. G.
